NM000294: eeg dataset, 12 subjects#
Farabbi2020: Motor-Imagery EEG dataset during robot-arm control
Access recordings and metadata through EEGDash.
Citation: Andrea Farabbi, Fabiola Ghiringhelli, Luca Mainardi, Joao Miguel Sanches, Plinio Moreno, Jose Santos-Victor, Patricia Figueiredo, Athanasios Vourvopoulos (2020). Farabbi2020: Motor-Imagery EEG dataset during robot-arm control. 10.82901/nemar.nm000294
Modality: eeg Subjects: 12 Recordings: 144 License: CC-BY-4.0 Source: nemar
Metadata: Complete (100%)
12-participant EEG dataset — Farabbi2020: Motor-Imagery EEG dataset during robot-arm control.
Quickstart#
Install
pip install eegdash
Access the data
from eegdash.dataset import NM000294
dataset = NM000294(cache_dir="./data")
# Get the raw object of the first recording
raw = dataset.datasets[0].raw
print(raw.info)
Filter by subject
dataset = NM000294(cache_dir="./data", subject="01")
Advanced query
dataset = NM000294(
cache_dir="./data",
query={"subject": {"$in": ["01", "02"]}},
)
Iterate recordings
for rec in dataset:
print(rec.subject, rec.raw.info['sfreq'])
If you use this dataset in your research, please cite the original authors.
BibTeX
@dataset{nm000294,
title = {Farabbi2020: Motor-Imagery EEG dataset during robot-arm control},
author = {Andrea Farabbi and Fabiola Ghiringhelli and Luca Mainardi and Joao Miguel Sanches and Plinio Moreno and Jose Santos-Victor and Patricia Figueiredo and Athanasios Vourvopoulos},
doi = {10.82901/nemar.nm000294},
url = {https://doi.org/10.82901/nemar.nm000294},
}
About This Dataset#
Motor-Imagery EEG dataset during robot-arm control [1]_.
Code: Farabbi2020
Paradigm: imagery DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5882500 Subjects: 12 Sessions per subject: 3 Events: left_hand=769, right_hand=770 Trial interval: [0, 4] s Runs per session: 4 File format: GDF
Farabbi2020
Acquisition
Sampling rate: 250.0 Hz Number of channels: 35 Channel types: eeg=32, misc=3 Channel names: Fp1, Fz, F3, F7, FT9, FC5, FC1, C3, T7, TP9, CP5, CP1, Pz, P3, P7, O1, Oz, O2, P4, P8, TP10, CP6, CP2, Cz, C4, T8, FT10, FC6, FC2, F4, F8, Fp2
View full README
Farabbi2020
Acquisition
Sampling rate: 250.0 Hz Number of channels: 35 Channel types: eeg=32, misc=3 Channel names: Fp1, Fz, F3, F7, FT9, FC5, FC1, C3, T7, TP9, CP5, CP1, Pz, P3, P7, O1, Oz, O2, P4, P8, TP10, CP6, CP2, Cz, C4, T8, FT10, FC6, FC2, F4, F8, Fp2 Montage: standard_1020 Hardware: LiveAmp 32 (Brain Products GmbH) Sensor type: active Ag/AgCl Line frequency: 50.0 Hz Cap manufacturer: Brain Products GmbH Cap model: actiCAP Electrode type: active
Participants
Number of subjects: 12 Health status: healthy BCI experience: naive
Experimental Protocol
Paradigm: imagery Number of classes: 2 Class labels: left_hand, right_hand Trial duration: 6.0 s Study design: Cue-based left- vs right-hand motor imagery controlling a Baxter robot arm reaching toward objects, under first-person and third-person visual feedback. Feedback type: visual Stimulus type: visual Stimulus modalities: visual Synchronicity: cue-based Mode: online Training/test split: True Instructions: Imagine left- or right-hand movement following the cue to steer the robot arm toward the target object.
HED Event Annotations
Schema: HED 8.4.0 | Browse: https://www.hedtags.org/hed-schema-browser left_hand
├─ Sensory-event, Experimental-stimulus, Visual-presentation
└─ Agent-action
└─ Imagine
├─ Move
└─ Left, Hand
right_hand
├─ Sensory-event, Experimental-stimulus, Visual-presentation
└─ Agent-action
└─ Imagine
├─ Move
└─ Right, Hand
Paradigm-Specific Parameters
Detected paradigm: motor_imagery Imagery tasks: left_hand, right_hand Imagery duration: 4.0 s
Data Structure
Trials: 480 Trials per class: left_hand=240, right_hand=240 Blocks per session: 4 Trials context: Three sessions per subject, each with four motor-imagery runs (first-person training/online, third-person training/online) plus an ignored resting-state recording. Each run: 20 left + 20 right trials (40); 160 per session, 480 per subject. Each trial: 2 s baseline + 4 s imagery.
Preprocessing
Data state: raw Preprocessing applied: False
Signal Processing
Frequency bands: mu=[8.0, 12.0] Hz; beta=[12.0, 30.0] Hz
Cross-Validation
Evaluation type: within_subject, cross_session
BCI Application
Applications: robot arm control, neurorehabilitation Environment: lab Online feedback: True
Tags
Pathology: healthy Modality: motor Type: Motor Imagery
Documentation
Description: Motor-imagery EEG from 12 healthy naive subjects performing cued left/right-hand imagery to control a Baxter robot arm, across three sessions with first- and third-person visual feedback conditions. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5882500 License: CC-BY-4.0 Investigators: Andrea Farabbi, Fabiola Ghiringhelli, Luca Mainardi, Joao Miguel Sanches, Plinio Moreno, Jose Santos-Victor, Patricia Figueiredo, Athanasios Vourvopoulos Institution: Politecnico di Milano; Instituto Superior Tecnico, Universidade de Lisboa Country: IT Repository: Zenodo Data URL: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5882500 Publication year: 2020 Keywords: motor imagery, BCI, brain-computer interface, EEG, robot arm, neurorehabilitation
References
Farabbi, A., Ghiringhelli, F., Mainardi, L., Sanches, J. M., Moreno, P., Santos-Victor, J., Figueiredo, P., and Vourvopoulos, A. (2020). Motor-Imagery EEG Dataset During Robot-Arm Control. Zenodo. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5882500 Notes .. versionadded:: 1.8.0 Appelhoff, S., Sanderson, M., Brooks, T., Vliet, M., Quentin, R., Holdgraf, C., Chaumon, M., Mikulan, E., Tavabi, K., Hochenberger, R., Welke, D., Brunner, C., Rockhill, A., Larson, E., Gramfort, A. and Jas, M. (2019). MNE-BIDS: Organizing electrophysiological data into the BIDS format and facilitating their analysis. Journal of Open Source Software 4: (1896). https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01896 Pernet, C. R., Appelhoff, S., Gorgolewski, K. J., Flandin, G., Phillips, C., Delorme, A., Oostenveld, R. (2019). EEG-BIDS, an extension to the brain imaging data structure for electroencephalography. Scientific Data, 6, 103. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0104-8 Generated by MOABB 1.8.0dev0 (Mother of All BCI Benchmarks) NeuroTechX/moabb
Ethics
Ethics approval: the data analysed in this deposit were collected under the ethics approval obtained by the original investigators and reported in the primary publication cited above (see References/Documentation sections of this README). Participants gave informed consent in the source study. No new human-subject data were collected during this BIDS re-release; this NEMAR record only reformats the published source data into BIDS via MOABB.
Please consult the primary publication for the exact IRB/ethics committee reference.
Ethics
Approved by the Ethics Committee of CHULN and CAML (Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon), reference number 245/19. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki (Farabbi et al. 2020, Zenodo DOI 10.5281/zenodo.5882500).
Verbatim from the source:
Approved by the Ethics Committee of CHULN and CAML (Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon) with reference number: 245/19.
Source: Zenodo record 5882500 ‘notes’ field (https://zenodo.org/records/5882500).
NEMAR Metadata#
[](https://doi.org/10.82901/nemar.nm000294) Farabbi2020 =========== Motor-Imagery EEG dataset during robot-arm control [1]_. Dataset Overview —————-
Code: Farabbi2020 Paradigm: imagery DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5882500 Subjects: 12 Sessions per subject: 3 Events: left_hand=769, right_hand=770 Trial interval: [0, 4] s Runs per session: 4 File format: GDF
Acquisition#
Sampling rate: 250.0 Hz Number of channels: 35 Channel types: eeg=32, misc=3 Channel names: Fp1, Fz, F3, F7, FT9, FC5, FC1, C3, T7, TP9, CP5, CP1, Pz, P3, P7, O1, Oz, O2, P4, P8, TP10, CP6, CP2, Cz, C4, T8, FT10, FC6, FC2, F4, F8, Fp2 Montage: standard_1020 Hardware: LiveAmp 32 (Brain Products GmbH) Sensor type: active Ag/AgCl Line frequency: 50.0 Hz Cap manufacturer: Brain Products GmbH Cap model: actiCAP Electrode type: active
Participants#
Number of subjects: 12 Health status: healthy BCI experience: naive
Experimental Protocol#
Paradigm: imagery Number of classes: 2 Class labels: left_hand, right_hand Trial duration: 6.0 s Study design: Cue-based left- vs right-hand motor imagery controlling a Baxter robot arm reaching toward objects, under first-person and third-person visual feedback. Feedback type: visual Stimulus type: visual Stimulus modalities: visual Synchronicity: cue-based Mode: online Training/test split: True Instructions: Imagine left- or right-hand movement following the cue to steer the robot arm toward the target object.
HED Event Annotations#
Schema: HED 8.4.0 | Browse: https://www.hedtags.org/hed-schema-browser left_hand
├─ Sensory-event, Experimental-stimulus, Visual-presentation └─ Agent-action
- └─ Imagine
├─ Move └─ Left, Hand
- right_hand
├─ Sensory-event, Experimental-stimulus, Visual-presentation └─ Agent-action
- └─ Imagine
├─ Move └─ Right, Hand
Paradigm-Specific Parameters#
Detected paradigm: motor_imagery Imagery tasks: left_hand, right_hand Imagery duration: 4.0 s
Data Structure#
Trials: 480 Trials per class: left_hand=240, right_hand=240 Blocks per session: 4 Trials context: Three sessions per subject, each with four motor-imagery runs (first-person training/online, third-person training/online) plus an ignored resting-state recording. Each run: 20 left + 20 right trials (40); 160 per session, 480 per subject. Each trial: 2 s baseline + 4 s imagery.
Preprocessing#
Data state: raw Preprocessing applied: False
Signal Processing#
Frequency bands: mu=[8.0, 12.0] Hz; beta=[12.0, 30.0] Hz
Cross-Validation#
Evaluation type: within_subject, cross_session
BCI Application#
Applications: robot arm control, neurorehabilitation Environment: lab Online feedback: True
Documentation#
Description: Motor-imagery EEG from 12 healthy naive subjects performing cued left/right-hand imagery to control a Baxter robot arm, across three sessions with first- and third-person visual feedback conditions. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5882500 License: CC-BY-4.0 Investigators: Andrea Farabbi, Fabiola Ghiringhelli, Luca Mainardi, Joao Miguel Sanches, Plinio Moreno, Jose Santos-Victor, Patricia Figueiredo, Athanasios Vourvopoulos Institution: Politecnico di Milano; Instituto Superior Tecnico, Universidade de Lisboa Country: IT Repository: Zenodo Data URL: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5882500 Publication year: 2020 Keywords: motor imagery, BCI, brain-computer interface, EEG, robot arm, neurorehabilitation
References#
Farabbi, A., Ghiringhelli, F., Mainardi, L., Sanches, J. M., Moreno, P., Santos-Victor, J., Figueiredo, P., and Vourvopoulos, A. (2020). Motor-Imagery EEG Dataset During Robot-Arm Control. Zenodo. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5882500 Notes .. versionadded:: 1.8.0 Appelhoff, S., Sanderson, M., Brooks, T., Vliet, M., Quentin, R., Holdgraf, C., Chaumon, M., Mikulan, E., Tavabi, K., Hochenberger, R., Welke, D., Brunner, C., Rockhill, A., Larson, E., Gramfort, A. and Jas, M. (2019). MNE-BIDS: Organizing electrophysiological data into the BIDS format and facilitating their analysis. Journal of Open Source Software 4: (1896). https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01896 Pernet, C. R., Appelhoff, S., Gorgolewski, K. J., Flandin, G., Phillips, C., Delorme, A., Oostenveld, R. (2019). EEG-BIDS, an extension to the brain imaging data structure for electroencephalography. Scientific Data, 6, 103. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0104-8 — Generated by MOABB 1.8.0dev0 (Mother of All BCI Benchmarks) NeuroTechX/moabb Ethics —— Ethics approval: the data analysed in this deposit were collected under the ethics approval obtained by the original investigators and reported in the primary publication cited above (see References/Documentation sections of this README). Participants gave informed consent in the source study. No new human-subject data were collected during this BIDS re-release; this NEMAR record only reformats the published source data into BIDS via MOABB. Please consult the primary publication for the exact IRB/ethics committee reference. ## Ethics Approved by the Ethics Committee of CHULN and CAML (Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon), reference number 245/19. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki (Farabbi et al. 2020, Zenodo DOI 10.5281/zenodo.5882500). Verbatim from the source: > Approved by the Ethics Committee of CHULN and CAML (Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon) with reference number: 245/19. Source: Zenodo record 5882500 ‘notes’ field (https://zenodo.org/records/5882500).
License: CC-BY-4.0
Authors:
Andrea Farabbi
Fabiola Ghiringhelli
Luca Mainardi
Joao Miguel Sanches
Plinio Moreno
… and 3 more
Versions:
Version |
DOI |
Released |
|---|---|---|
|
Cohort#
Dataset Statistics#
Channel counts: 32 ch (n=144 recordings)
Sampling frequencies: 250.0 Hz (n=144 recordings)
Total recording duration: 17 h 32 min
Signal · Electrodes & live trace#
Live trace viewer — sub-1 · ses-0 · task-imagery · run-0
Showing one representative recording out of
12 subjects and 144 recordings in this dataset.
Browse the full set on OpenNeuro;
drop any other _eeg.{set,edf,bdf,vhdr} file onto the
viewer (or pass ?eeg=<url>) to inspect it.
Electrode layout — EEG · 32 sensors — 32 channels
NEMAR Processing Statistics#
The plots below are generated by NEMAR’s automated EEG pipeline. The histogram shows pipeline success for data cleaning and ICA decomposition, the percentage of data frames and EEG channels retained after artefact removal, line noise per channel (RMS, dB), and the age/gender distribution of participants.
HED event descriptors word cloud
Manifest#
File Explorer#
Browse the BIDS file structure of this dataset. Records are fetched on demand from the EEGDash catalog the first time you open the explorer.
Full dataset metadata table
Dataset ID |
|
Title |
Farabbi2020: Motor-Imagery EEG dataset during robot-arm control |
Author (year) |
— |
Canonical |
— |
Importable as |
|
Year |
2020 |
Authors |
Andrea Farabbi, Fabiola Ghiringhelli, Luca Mainardi, Joao Miguel Sanches, Plinio Moreno, Jose Santos-Victor, Patricia Figueiredo, Athanasios Vourvopoulos |
License |
CC-BY-4.0 |
Citation / DOI |
|
Source links |
OpenNeuro | NeMAR | Source URL |
Copy-paste BibTeX
@dataset{nm000294,
title = {Farabbi2020: Motor-Imagery EEG dataset during robot-arm control},
author = {Andrea Farabbi and Fabiola Ghiringhelli and Luca Mainardi and Joao Miguel Sanches and Plinio Moreno and Jose Santos-Victor and Patricia Figueiredo and Athanasios Vourvopoulos},
doi = {10.82901/nemar.nm000294},
url = {https://doi.org/10.82901/nemar.nm000294},
}
API Reference#
eegdash.datasetEEGDashDataset- class eegdash.dataset.NM000294(cache_dir: str, query: dict | None = None, s3_bucket: str | None = None, **kwargs)[source]#
Farabbi2020: Motor-Imagery EEG dataset during robot-arm control
- Study:
nm000294(NeMAR)- Author (year):
—
- Canonical:
—
Also importable as:
NM000294.Modality:
eeg; Subject type:Unknown. Subjects: 12; recordings: 144; tasks: 1.- Parameters:
cache_dir (str | Path) – Directory where data are cached locally.
query (dict | None) – Additional MongoDB-style filters to AND with the dataset selection. Must not contain the key
dataset.s3_bucket (str | None) – Base S3 bucket used to locate the data.
**kwargs (dict) – Additional keyword arguments forwarded to
EEGDashDataset.
- data_dir#
Local dataset cache directory (
cache_dir / dataset_id).- Type:
Path
Notes
Each item is a recording; recording-level metadata are available via
dataset.description.querysupports MongoDB-style filters on fields inALLOWED_QUERY_FIELDSand is combined with the dataset filter. Dataset-specific caveats are not provided in the summary metadata.References
OpenNeuro dataset: https://openneuro.org/datasets/nm000294 NeMAR dataset: https://nemar.org/dataexplorer/detail?dataset_id=nm000294 DOI: https://doi.org/10.82901/nemar.nm000294
Examples
>>> from eegdash.dataset import NM000294 >>> dataset = NM000294(cache_dir="./data") >>> recording = dataset[0] >>> raw = recording.load()
- __init__(cache_dir: str, query: dict | None = None, s3_bucket: str | None = None, **kwargs)[source]#
- save(path: str, overwrite: bool = False, offset: int = 0)[source]#
Save datasets to files by creating one subdirectory for each dataset:
path/ 0/ 0-raw.fif | 0-epo.fif description.json raw_preproc_kwargs.json (if raws were preprocessed) window_kwargs.json (if this is a windowed dataset) window_preproc_kwargs.json (if windows were preprocessed) target_name.json (if target_name is not None and dataset is raw) 1/ 1-raw.fif | 1-epo.fif description.json raw_preproc_kwargs.json (if raws were preprocessed) window_kwargs.json (if this is a windowed dataset) window_preproc_kwargs.json (if windows were preprocessed) target_name.json (if target_name is not None and dataset is raw)
- Parameters:
path (str) –
- Directory in which subdirectories are created to store
-raw.fif | -epo.fif and .json files to.
overwrite (bool) – Whether to delete old subdirectories that will be saved to in this call.
offset (int) – If provided, the integer is added to the id of the dataset in the concat. This is useful in the setting of very large datasets, where one dataset has to be processed and saved at a time to account for its original position.
BaseDataset from braindecode — windowed via create_windows_from_events.braindecodeDataLoader; supports parallel workers and on-the-fly augmentations.pytorchSwap any load_dataset(...) call for nm000294 to reproduce the tutorial on this dataset.
Citation
Andrea Farabbi, Fabiola Ghiringhelli, Luca Mainardi, Joao Miguel Sanches, Plinio Moreno, … (2020). Farabbi2020: Motor-Imagery EEG dataset during robot-arm control. 10.82901/nemar.nm000294
Provenance
¹Contributed to nemar in BIDS format.
²Curated & ingested by the EEGDash catalog; see CITATION.cff for canonical reference.
³Persistent identifier: 10.82901/nemar.nm000294.
See Also#
eegdash.dataset.EEGDashDataseteegdash.dataset