NM000189: eeg dataset, 10 subjects#
BNCI 2015-003 P300 dataset
Access recordings and metadata through EEGDash.
Citation: Martijn Schreuder, Thomas Rost, Michael Tangermann (2011). BNCI 2015-003 P300 dataset.
Modality: eeg Subjects: 10 Recordings: 20 License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0 Source: nemar
Metadata: Complete (90%)
Quickstart#
Install
pip install eegdash
Access the data
from eegdash.dataset import NM000189
dataset = NM000189(cache_dir="./data")
# Get the raw object of the first recording
raw = dataset.datasets[0].raw
print(raw.info)
Filter by subject
dataset = NM000189(cache_dir="./data", subject="01")
Advanced query
dataset = NM000189(
cache_dir="./data",
query={"subject": {"$in": ["01", "02"]}},
)
Iterate recordings
for rec in dataset:
print(rec.subject, rec.raw.info['sfreq'])
If you use this dataset in your research, please cite the original authors.
BibTeX
@dataset{nm000189,
title = {BNCI 2015-003 P300 dataset},
author = {Martijn Schreuder and Thomas Rost and Michael Tangermann},
}
About This Dataset#
BNCI 2015-003 P300 dataset
BNCI 2015-003 P300 dataset.
Dataset Overview
Code: BNCI2015-003
Paradigm: p300
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.06.045
View full README
BNCI 2015-003 P300 dataset
BNCI 2015-003 P300 dataset.
Dataset Overview
Code: BNCI2015-003
Paradigm: p300
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.06.045
Subjects: 10
Sessions per subject: 1
Events: Target=2, NonTarget=1
Trial interval: [0, 0.8] s
Runs per session: 2
Session IDs: Session 1, Session 2
File format: gdf
Data preprocessed: True
Number of contributing labs: 1
Acquisition
Sampling rate: 256.0 Hz
Number of channels: 8
Channel types: eeg=8
Channel names: Fz, Cz, P3, Pz, P4, PO7, Oz, PO8
Montage: standard_1005
Hardware: BrainAmp
Software: Matlab
Reference: nose
Sensor type: Ag/AgCl electrodes
Line frequency: 50.0 Hz
Online filters: hardware analog band-pass filter between 0.1 and 250 Hz
Impedance threshold: 15.0 kOhm
Cap manufacturer: Brain Products
Electrode type: Ag/AgCl
Electrode material: silver/silver chloride
Auxiliary channels: EOG (2 ch, bipolar)
Participants
Number of subjects: 10
Health status: patients
Clinical population: Healthy
Age: mean=34.1, std=11.4, min=20, max=57
BCI experience: naive
Species: human
Experimental Protocol
Paradigm: p300
Task type: auditory_oddball
Number of classes: 2
Class labels: Target, NonTarget
Tasks: spelling, auditory_attention
Study design: Auditory Multi-class Spatial ERP (AMUSE) paradigm using spatial auditory cues from six speaker locations in azimuth plane. Two-step hex-o-spell like interface for character selection. Subjects mentally count target stimuli from one of six spatial directions.
Study domain: communication
Feedback type: auditory
Stimulus type: spatial_auditory
Stimulus modalities: auditory
Primary modality: auditory
Synchronicity: synchronous
Mode: online
Training/test split: True
Instructions: Focus attention to one target direction and mentally count the number of appearances
Stimulus presentation: soa_ms=175, stimulus_duration_ms=40, stimulus_intensity_db=58, speaker_arrangement=6 speakers at ear height, evenly distributed in circle with 60° distance, radius 65 cm
HED Event Annotations
Schema: HED 8.4.0 | Browse: https://www.hedtags.org/hed-schema-browser
Target
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Target
NonTarget
├─ Sensory-event
├─ Experimental-stimulus
├─ Visual-presentation
└─ Non-target
Paradigm-Specific Parameters
Detected paradigm: p300
Number of targets: 6
Stimulus onset asynchrony: 175.0 ms
Data Structure
Trials: 48
Trials per class: calibration_per_direction=8
Trials context: calibration_phase
Preprocessing
Data state: filtered
Preprocessing applied: True
Steps: low-pass filter, downsampling, baselining
Highpass filter: 0.1 Hz
Lowpass filter: 40.0 Hz
Bandpass filter: {‘low_cutoff_hz’: 0.1, ‘high_cutoff_hz’: 40.0}
Filter type: analog hardware filter for acquisition; low-pass for online
Artifact methods: variance criterium, peak-to-peak difference criterium
Re-reference: nose
Downsampled to: 100.0 Hz
Epoch window: [-0.15, None]
Notes: For online use signal was low-pass filtered below 40 Hz and downsampled to 100 Hz. Data baselined using 150 ms pre-stimulus data as reference.
Signal Processing
Classifiers: LDA, linear binary classifier
Feature extraction: spatio-temporal features, r2 coefficient, interval averaging
Spatial filters: shrinkage regularization (Ledoit-Wolf)
Cross-Validation
Method: online
Evaluation type: online
Performance (Original Study)
Accuracy: 77.4%
Itr: 2.84 bits/min
Char Per Min Session1: 0.59
Char Per Min Session2 Max: 1.41
Char Per Min Session2 Avg: 0.94
Itr Session2 Avg: 5.26
Itr Session2 Max: 7.55
Success Rate Session1: 76.0
BCI Application
Applications: speller, communication
Environment: laboratory
Online feedback: True
Tags
Pathology: Healthy
Modality: Auditory
Type: ERP, P300
Documentation
Description: Auditory BCI speller using spatial cues (AMUSE paradigm) allowing purely auditory communication interface
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.06.045
Associated paper DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2011.00112
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
Investigators: Martijn Schreuder, Thomas Rost, Michael Tangermann
Senior author: Michael Tangermann
Contact: schreuder@tu-berlin.de
Institution: Berlin Institute of Technology
Department: Machine Learning Laboratory
Address: Machine Learning Laboratory, Berlin Institute of Technology, FR6-9, Franklinstraße 28/29, 10587 Berlin, Germany
Country: Germany
Repository: BNCI Horizon
Publication year: 2011
Funding: European ICT Programme Project FP7-224631; European ICT Programme Project FP7-216886; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG MU 987/3-2); Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF FKZ 01IB001A, 01GQ0850); FP7-ICT PASCAL2 Network of Excellence ICT-216886
Ethics approval: Ethics Committee of the Charité University Hospital
Acknowledgements: Thomas Denck, David List and Larissa Queda for help with experiments. Klaus-Robert Müller and Benjamin Blankertz for fruitful discussions.
Keywords: brain-computer interface, directional hearing, auditory event-related potentials, P300, N200, dynamic subtrials
External Links
Abstract
This online study introduces an auditory spelling interface that eliminates the necessity for visual representation. In up to two sessions, a group of healthy subjects (N=21) was asked to use a text entry application, utilizing the spatial cues of the AMUSE paradigm (Auditory Multi-class Spatial ERP). The speller relies on the auditory sense both for stimulation and the core feedback. Without prior BCI experience, 76% of the participants were able to write a full sentence during the first session. By exploiting the advantages of a newly introduced dynamic stopping method, a maximum writing speed of 1.41 char/min (7.55 bits/min) could be reached during the second session (average: 0.94 char/min, 5.26 bits/min).
Methodology
Participants surrounded by six speakers at ear height in circle (60° spacing, 65 cm radius). Each direction associated with unique combination of tone (base frequency + harmonics) and band-pass filtered noise. Two-step hex-o-spell interface for character selection. Session 1: calibration (48 trials, 8 per direction, 15 iterations each) followed by online spelling with 15 fixed iterations. Session 2: calibration followed by online spelling with dynamic stopping method (4-15 iterations). Spatio-temporal feature extraction using r2 coefficient and interval selection (2-4 intervals for early and late components, 112-224 features total). Linear binary classifier with shrinkage regularization (Ledoit-Wolf). Decision making based on median classifier scores across iterations.
References
Schreuder, M., Rost, T., & Tangermann, M. (2011). Listen, you are writing! Speeding up online spelling with a dynamic auditory BCI. Frontiers in neuroscience, 5, 112. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2011.00112
Notes
.. note::
BNCI2015_003 was previously named BNCI2015003. BNCI2015003 will be removed in version 1.1.
.. versionadded:: 0.4.0
Appelhoff, S., Sanderson, M., Brooks, T., Vliet, M., Quentin, R., Holdgraf, C., Chaumon, M., Mikulan, E., Tavabi, K., Hochenberger, R., Welke, D., Brunner, C., Rockhill, A., Larson, E., Gramfort, A. and Jas, M. (2019). MNE-BIDS: Organizing electrophysiological data into the BIDS format and facilitating their analysis. Journal of Open Source Software 4: (1896). https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01896
Pernet, C. R., Appelhoff, S., Gorgolewski, K. J., Flandin, G., Phillips, C., Delorme, A., Oostenveld, R. (2019). EEG-BIDS, an extension to the brain imaging data structure for electroencephalography. Scientific Data, 6, 103. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0104-8
Generated by MOABB 1.5.0 (Mother of All BCI Benchmarks)
NeuroTechX/moabb
Dataset Information#
Dataset ID |
|
Title |
BNCI 2015-003 P300 dataset |
Author (year) |
|
Canonical |
— |
Importable as |
|
Year |
2011 |
Authors |
Martijn Schreuder, Thomas Rost, Michael Tangermann |
License |
CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0 |
Citation / DOI |
Unknown |
Source links |
OpenNeuro | NeMAR | Source URL |
Found an issue with this dataset?
If you encounter any problems with this dataset (missing files, incorrect metadata, loading errors, etc.), please let us know!
Technical Details#
Subjects: 10
Recordings: 20
Tasks: 1
Channels: 8
Sampling rate (Hz): 256.0
Duration (hours): 1.8684006076388888
Pathology: Healthy
Modality: Auditory
Type: Attention
Size on disk: 21.8 MB
File count: 20
Format: BIDS
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
DOI: —
Electrode Layout#
Electrode layout — EEG · 8 sensors — 8 channels
Dataset Statistics#
Age distribution (n=10, range 34–34 yr)
Channel counts: 8 ch (n=40 recordings)
Sampling frequencies: 256.0 Hz (n=40 recordings)
Total recording duration: 1 h 52 min
NEMAR Processing Statistics#
The plots below are generated by NEMAR’s automated EEG pipeline. The histogram shows pipeline success for data cleaning and ICA decomposition, the percentage of data frames and EEG channels retained after artefact removal, line noise per channel (RMS, dB), and the age/gender distribution of participants.
HED event descriptors word cloud
File Explorer#
Browse the BIDS file structure of this dataset. Records are fetched on demand from the EEGDash catalog the first time you open the explorer.
API Reference#
Use the NM000189 class to access this dataset programmatically.
- class eegdash.dataset.NM000189(cache_dir: str, query: dict | None = None, s3_bucket: str | None = None, **kwargs)[source]#
Bases:
EEGDashDatasetBNCI 2015-003 P300 dataset
- Study:
nm000189(NeMAR)- Author (year):
Schreuder2015_P300- Canonical:
—
Also importable as:
NM000189,Schreuder2015_P300.Modality:
eeg; Experiment type:Attention; Subject type:Healthy. Subjects: 10; recordings: 20; tasks: 1.- Parameters:
cache_dir (str | Path) – Directory where data are cached locally.
query (dict | None) – Additional MongoDB-style filters to AND with the dataset selection. Must not contain the key
dataset.s3_bucket (str | None) – Base S3 bucket used to locate the data.
**kwargs (dict) – Additional keyword arguments forwarded to
EEGDashDataset.
- data_dir#
Local dataset cache directory (
cache_dir / dataset_id).- Type:
Path
Notes
Each item is a recording; recording-level metadata are available via
dataset.description.querysupports MongoDB-style filters on fields inALLOWED_QUERY_FIELDSand is combined with the dataset filter. Dataset-specific caveats are not provided in the summary metadata.References
OpenNeuro dataset: https://openneuro.org/datasets/nm000189 NeMAR dataset: https://nemar.org/dataexplorer/detail?dataset_id=nm000189
Examples
>>> from eegdash.dataset import NM000189 >>> dataset = NM000189(cache_dir="./data") >>> recording = dataset[0] >>> raw = recording.load()
- __init__(cache_dir: str, query: dict | None = None, s3_bucket: str | None = None, **kwargs)[source]#
- save(path: str, overwrite: bool = False, offset: int = 0)[source]#
Save datasets to files by creating one subdirectory for each dataset:
path/ 0/ 0-raw.fif | 0-epo.fif description.json raw_preproc_kwargs.json (if raws were preprocessed) window_kwargs.json (if this is a windowed dataset) window_preproc_kwargs.json (if windows were preprocessed) target_name.json (if target_name is not None and dataset is raw) 1/ 1-raw.fif | 1-epo.fif description.json raw_preproc_kwargs.json (if raws were preprocessed) window_kwargs.json (if this is a windowed dataset) window_preproc_kwargs.json (if windows were preprocessed) target_name.json (if target_name is not None and dataset is raw)
- Parameters:
path (str) –
- Directory in which subdirectories are created to store
-raw.fif | -epo.fif and .json files to.
overwrite (bool) – Whether to delete old subdirectories that will be saved to in this call.
offset (int) – If provided, the integer is added to the id of the dataset in the concat. This is useful in the setting of very large datasets, where one dataset has to be processed and saved at a time to account for its original position.
See Also#
eegdash.dataset.EEGDashDataseteegdash.dataset