EEGdash›NeMAR›NM000375
Iss. 375 · 16 subjects · 16 recordings · CC0-1.0
Dataset Brief · Neural interactions in the human frontal cortex dissociate re…

NM000375: ieeg dataset, 16 subjects#

Neural interactions in the human frontal cortex dissociate reward and punishment learning (Combrisson et al., 2024): preprocessed SEEG high-gamma power, 16 patients (derivative)

Access recordings and metadata through EEGDash.

Citation: Etienne Combrisson, Ruggero Basanisi, Sylvain Rheims, Philippe Kahane, Julien Bastin, Andrea Brovelli (2021). Neural interactions in the human frontal cortex dissociate reward and punishment learning (Combrisson et al., 2024): preprocessed SEEG high-gamma power, 16 patients (derivative). 10.82901/nemar.nm000375

Modality: ieeg Subjects: 16 Recordings: 16 License: CC0-1.0 Source: nemar

Metadata: Complete (100%)

16-participant iEEG dataset — Neural interactions in the human frontal cortex dissociate reward and punishment learning (Combrisson et al., 2024): preprocessed SEEG high-gamma power, 16 patients (derivative).

iEEG · 13 (2), 12 (2), 2, 5, 21, 11, 17, 32, 29, 15, 25, 3, 28, 10 ch256 HzBIDS 1.10.0Task · pblt
Layer 01Study
What was asked
Hypothesis, independent & dependent variables, paradigm, cohort, and the editorial caveats around what the recordings can and cannot answer.
Layer 02Signal · BIDS
What was recorded
Sidecars, channels & electrodes, coordinate system, event semantics, and quality stats from the NEMAR pipeline when available.
Layer 03Training · ML
What you can train on
Recommended access modes — MNE Raw, braindecode windows, PyTorch DataLoader — plus the targets the metadata makes addressable.
§ 01Access · Get started

Quickstart#

Install

pip install eegdash

Access the data

from eegdash.dataset import NM000375

dataset = NM000375(cache_dir="./data")
# Get the raw object of the first recording
raw = dataset.datasets[0].raw
print(raw.info)

Filter by subject

dataset = NM000375(cache_dir="./data", subject="01")

Advanced query

dataset = NM000375(
    cache_dir="./data",
    query={"subject": {"$in": ["01", "02"]}},
)

Iterate recordings

for rec in dataset:
    print(rec.subject, rec.raw.info['sfreq'])

If you use this dataset in your research, please cite the original authors.

BibTeX

@dataset{nm000375,
  title = {Neural interactions in the human frontal cortex dissociate reward and punishment learning (Combrisson et al., 2024): preprocessed SEEG high-gamma power, 16 patients (derivative)},
  author = {Etienne Combrisson and Ruggero Basanisi and Sylvain Rheims and Philippe Kahane and Julien Bastin and Andrea Brovelli},
  doi = {10.82901/nemar.nm000375},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.82901/nemar.nm000375},
}
§ 02Study · The README

About This Dataset#

Preprocessed intracranial (SEEG) high-gamma power from patients performing a probabilistic instrumental learning task

with a reward condition and a punishment condition. This is a DERIVATIVE dataset: the Dryad release contains only the authors’ high-gamma power, not raw iEEG.

The article (Combrisson et al., 2024, eLife) used information theory (mutual information, interaction information,

transfer entropy) on gamma power from four regions (anterior insula aINS, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex dlPFC, lateral orbitofrontal cortex lOFC, ventromedial prefrontal cortex vmPFC) to show a reward subsystem (lOFC-vmPFC, driven by vmPFC) and a punishment subsystem (aINS-dlPFC, driven by aINS), interacting synergistically (dlPFC-vmPFC) when encoding prediction errors. The patients and task are those of Gueguen et al. (2021, Nat Commun, doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23704-w).

DOI

Reward and punishment learning: SEEG high-gamma power (derivative)

Overview

Participants / cohort

  • 16 patients with pharmaco-resistant focal epilepsy undergoing presurgical evaluation with stereotactic intracerebral

View full README

DOI

Reward and punishment learning: SEEG high-gamma power (derivative)

Overview

Participants / cohort

  • 16 patients with pharmaco-resistant focal epilepsy undergoing presurgical evaluation with stereotactic intracerebral EEG, recorded at the clinical neurophysiology epilepsy departments of Grenoble and Lyon Hospitals (France) (eLife, Methods). The per-patient recording site and recording years are not given.

  • Cohort demographics reported by the eLife article: 33.5 ± 12.4 years old, 10 females. These numbers are identical to those of the 20-patient cohort of Gueguen et al. (2021) from which the patients come (Gueguen et al. Supplementary Table 1: 20 patients, 10 F / 10 M, ages 13-57, 18 right- and 2 left-handed). That table cannot be matched patient by patient to this release, so age, sex and handedness are n/a per participant.

  • participants.tsv:paper_subject gives the subject number used in eLife Figure 1-figure supplement 1 (subjects 1-16); the mapping was proven by matching the per-ROI derivation counts of every subject (release subject-6 does not exist, so release subjects 7-17 are paper subjects 6-16). The release contains 248 bipolar derivations (aINS 75, dlPFC 70, lOFC 59, vmPFC 44), the numbers reported in the article.

Task

Probabilistic instrumental learning task (eLife Methods): after training, 3 to 6 sessions of 96 trials; each session has four new pairs of abstract cues (Agathodaimon alphabet), each presented 24 times; two pairs are rewarding (+1€ vs 0€) and two punishing (-1€ vs 0€), intermingled, with reciprocal outcome probabilities 0.75/0.25 within a pair. The chosen cue turned red for 250 ms and the outcome appeared 1000 ms later. Patients were instructed to maximize their payoff, treating reward-seeking and punishment avoidance as equally important. Responses: left/right index on a joystick; stimuli on a 19-inch 60 Hz monitor with Presentation 16.5. Trial counts per patient (288-576) correspond to these 3-6 sessions.

Acquisition (original recordings)

Micromed audio-video-EEG monitoring system; depth iEEG sampled at 512 Hz or 1024 Hz, 0.1-200 Hz bandwidth; reference: one contact located in the white matter. Dixi depth electrodes (0.8 mm diameter, 8-18 contacts 2 mm wide, 1.5 mm apart), 5-17 electrodes per patient, implanted on clinical grounds only. Contacts localized on post-implant CT or MRI co-registered with the pre-implant MRI (IntrAnat; MarsAtlas and Destrieux parcellations) (eLife Methods). Per-patient sampling rates are not given.

Preprocessing applied by the authors (eLife Methods)

Bipolar derivations between adjacent contacts; only grey-matter derivations in the four ROIs; recording sites with artifacts or pathological activity (e.g. epileptic spikes) removed by visual inspection. Gamma power (50-100 Hz) by a multitaper transform (9 Slepian tapers, 15 cycles, 200 ms, 10 Hz time-bandwidth, centred at 75 Hz), down-sampled to 256 Hz and smoothed with a 10-point Savitzky-Golay filter (MNE-Python). Trial-wise prediction errors from a Q-learning model with learning rate, choice temperature and choice-repetition parameters.

Source

  • Dryad: Etienne Combrisson, Ruggero Basanisi, Sylvain Rheims, Philippe Kahane, Julien Bastin, Andrea Brovelli. Data from: Neural interactions in the human frontal cortex dissociate reward and punishment learning. doi:10.5061/dryad.jdfn2z3k4 (version 4, 2024-06-12). License: CC0 1.0 (Dryad record https://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.html; Zenodo replica 11612904 cc-zero).

  • Article: Combrisson et al. (2024) eLife, doi:10.7554/eLife.92938. Code: github.com/brainets/papercode (combrisson_pblt_2024).

  • Original files unchanged in sourcedata/dryad-jdfn2z3k4/ (zip with netCDF power, behaviour and anatomy xlsx).

What each file holds

  • sub-XX/ieeg/sub-XX_task-pblt_ieeg.*: BrainVision float32. All trials of the released array (n_trials x n_contacts x 513 samples, 256 Hz, -0.5 to 1.5 s around the outcome) placed back-to-back; values are the released float32 values (units not stated in the release: n/a). Segment boundaries and outcome times are in events.tsv.

  • *_events.tsv: one row per trial with the behaviour table (condition, prediction error, outcome) verbatim.

  • *_channels.tsv: bipolar derivations with the authors’ region of interest and hemisphere (anatomy xlsx).

  • The multitaper parameters stored in each netCDF file are copied into the ieeg.json DerivativeDescription.

  • Age, sex and handedness are not in the release (n/a). No electrode coordinates are released: electrodes.tsv lists the contacts named in the bipolar labels with x/y/z = n/a.

Known caveats

  • Derivative only (high-gamma power, units not stated); no raw iEEG, no electrode coordinates.

  • Age, sex and handedness are not available per patient; the cohort figures in the eLife article match the 20-patient superset of Gueguen et al. (2021) and may not describe exactly these 16 patients.

  • The eLife Methods state 512 Hz for six patients and 1024 Hz for 12 patients (18, for a cohort of 16); per-patient values are not given.

  • Whether the released values include the 10-point Savitzky-Golay smoothing described in the article is not stated in the release.

How to load

from mne_bids import BIDSPath, read_raw_bids
raw = read_raw_bids(BIDSPath(root=".", subject="01", task="pblt", datatype="ieeg"))

trial segments and outcome times: sub-01/ieeg/sub-01task-pbltevents.tsv

Citation

Combrisson E, Basanisi R, Gueguen MCM, Rheims S, Kahane P, Bastin J, Brovelli A (2024). Neural interactions in the human frontal cortex dissociate reward and punishment learning. eLife 12:RP92938. doi:10.7554/eLife.92938. Data: doi:10.5061/dryad.jdfn2z3k4. Original cohort: Gueguen MCM et al. (2021) Nat Commun 12:3344.

Provenance of the metadata

Dryad record (API v2, version 4) and release README; eLife article full text (PMC11213568, CC BY), including Figure 1-figure supplement 1; Gueguen et al. 2021 (PMC8184756) and its Supplementary Information (Supplementary Table 1).

Enriched 2026-10-07.

Ethics approval

Verbatim from Combrisson E, Basanisi R, Gueguen MCM, Rheims S, Kahane P, Bastin J, Brovelli A (2024). Neural interactions in the human frontal cortex dissociate reward and punishment learning. eLife 12:RP92938. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.92938, “Ethics” statement (also in Methods, iEEG data acquisition):

All patients gave written informed consent and the study received approval from the ethics committee (CPP 09-CHUG-12, study 0907) and from a competent authority (ANSM no: 2009-A00239-48).

NEMAR Metadata#

[![DOI](https://img.shields.io/badge/DOI-10.82901%2Fnemar.nm000375-blue)](https://doi.org/10.82901/nemar.nm000375) # Reward and punishment learning: SEEG high-gamma power (derivative) ## Overview Preprocessed intracranial (SEEG) high-gamma power from patients performing a probabilistic instrumental learning task with a reward condition and a punishment condition. This is a DERIVATIVE dataset: the Dryad release contains only the authors’ high-gamma power, not raw iEEG. The article (Combrisson et al., 2024, eLife) used information theory (mutual information, interaction information, transfer entropy) on gamma power from four regions (anterior insula aINS, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex dlPFC, lateral orbitofrontal cortex lOFC, ventromedial prefrontal cortex vmPFC) to show a reward subsystem (lOFC-vmPFC, driven by vmPFC) and a punishment subsystem (aINS-dlPFC, driven by aINS), interacting synergistically (dlPFC-vmPFC) when encoding prediction errors. The patients and task are those of Gueguen et al. (2021, Nat Commun, doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23704-w). ## Participants / cohort - 16 patients with pharmaco-resistant focal epilepsy undergoing presurgical evaluation with stereotactic intracerebral

EEG, recorded at the clinical neurophysiology epilepsy departments of Grenoble and Lyon Hospitals (France) (eLife, Methods). The per-patient recording site and recording years are not given.

  • Cohort demographics reported by the eLife article: 33.5 ± 12.4 years old, 10 females. These numbers are identical to those of the 20-patient cohort of Gueguen et al. (2021) from which the patients come (Gueguen et al. Supplementary Table 1: 20 patients, 10 F / 10 M, ages 13-57, 18 right- and 2 left-handed). That table cannot be matched patient by patient to this release, so age, sex and handedness are n/a per participant.

  • participants.tsv:paper_subject gives the subject number used in eLife Figure 1-figure supplement 1 (subjects 1-16); the mapping was proven by matching the per-ROI derivation counts of every subject (release subject-6 does not exist, so release subjects 7-17 are paper subjects 6-16). The release contains 248 bipolar derivations (aINS 75, dlPFC 70, lOFC 59, vmPFC 44), the numbers reported in the article.

## Task Probabilistic instrumental learning task (eLife Methods): after training, 3 to 6 sessions of 96 trials; each session has four new pairs of abstract cues (Agathodaimon alphabet), each presented 24 times; two pairs are rewarding (+1€ vs 0€) and two punishing (-1€ vs 0€), intermingled, with reciprocal outcome probabilities 0.75/0.25 within a pair. The chosen cue turned red for 250 ms and the outcome appeared 1000 ms later. Patients were instructed to maximize their payoff, treating reward-seeking and punishment avoidance as equally important. Responses: left/right index on a joystick; stimuli on a 19-inch 60 Hz monitor with Presentation 16.5. Trial counts per patient (288-576) correspond to these 3-6 sessions. ## Acquisition (original recordings) Micromed audio-video-EEG monitoring system; depth iEEG sampled at 512 Hz or 1024 Hz, 0.1-200 Hz bandwidth; reference: one contact located in the white matter. Dixi depth electrodes (0.8 mm diameter, 8-18 contacts 2 mm wide, 1.5 mm apart), 5-17 electrodes per patient, implanted on clinical grounds only. Contacts localized on post-implant CT or MRI co-registered with the pre-implant MRI (IntrAnat; MarsAtlas and Destrieux parcellations) (eLife Methods). Per-patient sampling rates are not given. ## Preprocessing applied by the authors (eLife Methods) Bipolar derivations between adjacent contacts; only grey-matter derivations in the four ROIs; recording sites with artifacts or pathological activity (e.g. epileptic spikes) removed by visual inspection. Gamma power (50-100 Hz) by a multitaper transform (9 Slepian tapers, 15 cycles, 200 ms, 10 Hz time-bandwidth, centred at 75 Hz), down-sampled to 256 Hz and smoothed with a 10-point Savitzky-Golay filter (MNE-Python). Trial-wise prediction errors from a Q-learning model with learning rate, choice temperature and choice-repetition parameters. ## Source - Dryad: Etienne Combrisson, Ruggero Basanisi, Sylvain Rheims, Philippe Kahane, Julien Bastin, Andrea Brovelli. Data from: Neural interactions in the human frontal cortex dissociate reward and

punishment learning. doi:10.5061/dryad.jdfn2z3k4 (version 4, 2024-06-12). License: CC0 1.0 (Dryad record https://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.html; Zenodo replica 11612904 cc-zero).

  • Article: Combrisson et al. (2024) eLife, doi:10.7554/eLife.92938. Code: github.com/brainets/papercode (combrisson_pblt_2024).

  • Original files unchanged in sourcedata/dryad-jdfn2z3k4/ (zip with netCDF power, behaviour and anatomy xlsx).

## What each file holds - sub-XX/ieeg/sub-XX_task-pblt_ieeg.*: BrainVision float32. All trials of the released array (n_trials x

n_contacts x 513 samples, 256 Hz, -0.5 to 1.5 s around the outcome) placed back-to-back; values are the released float32 values (units not stated in the release: n/a). Segment boundaries and outcome times are in events.tsv.

  • *_events.tsv: one row per trial with the behaviour table (condition, prediction error, outcome) verbatim.

  • *_channels.tsv: bipolar derivations with the authors’ region of interest and hemisphere (anatomy xlsx).

  • The multitaper parameters stored in each netCDF file are copied into the ieeg.json DerivativeDescription.

  • Age, sex and handedness are not in the release (n/a). No electrode coordinates are released: electrodes.tsv lists the contacts named in the bipolar labels with x/y/z = n/a.

## Known caveats - Derivative only (high-gamma power, units not stated); no raw iEEG, no electrode coordinates. - Age, sex and handedness are not available per patient; the cohort figures in the eLife article match the 20-patient

superset of Gueguen et al. (2021) and may not describe exactly these 16 patients.

  • The eLife Methods state 512 Hz for six patients and 1024 Hz for 12 patients (18, for a cohort of 16); per-patient values are not given.

  • Whether the released values include the 10-point Savitzky-Golay smoothing described in the article is not stated in the release.

## How to load `python from mne_bids import BIDSPath, read_raw_bids raw = read_raw_bids(BIDSPath(root=".", subject="01", task="pblt", datatype="ieeg")) # trial segments and outcome times: sub-01/ieeg/sub-01_task-pblt_events.tsv ` ## Citation Combrisson E, Basanisi R, Gueguen MCM, Rheims S, Kahane P, Bastin J, Brovelli A (2024). Neural interactions in the human frontal cortex dissociate reward and punishment learning. eLife 12:RP92938. doi:10.7554/eLife.92938. Data: doi:10.5061/dryad.jdfn2z3k4. Original cohort: Gueguen MCM et al. (2021) Nat Commun 12:3344. ## Provenance of the metadata Dryad record (API v2, version 4) and release README; eLife article full text (PMC11213568, CC BY), including Figure 1-figure supplement 1; Gueguen et al. 2021 (PMC8184756) and its Supplementary Information (Supplementary Table 1). Enriched 2026-10-07. ## Ethics approval Verbatim from Combrisson E, Basanisi R, Gueguen MCM, Rheims S, Kahane P, Bastin J, Brovelli A (2024). Neural interactions in the human frontal cortex dissociate reward and punishment learning. eLife 12:RP92938. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.92938, “Ethics” statement (also in Methods, iEEG data acquisition): > All patients gave written informed consent and the study received approval from the ethics committee (CPP 09-CHUG-12, study 0907) and from a competent authority (ANSM no: 2009-A00239-48).

License: CC0-1.0

Authors:

  • Etienne Combrisson

  • Ruggero Basanisi

  • Sylvain Rheims

  • Philippe Kahane

  • Julien Bastin

  • … and 1 more

Versions:

Version

DOI

Released

current

10.82901/nemar.nm000375

§ 03Cohort · Participants

Cohort#

Dataset Statistics#

Channel counts (ch)

2351011121315172125282932

Sampling frequencies: 256.0 Hz (n=16 recordings)

Total recording duration: 4 h 16 min

§ 04Signal · Electrodes & trace

Signal · Electrodes & live trace#

Fig. 01 Signal & montage 13 (2), 12 (2), 2, 5, 21, 11, 17, 32, 29, 15, 25, 3, 28, 10 ch · iEEG · 256 Hz · 16 subjects, 16 recordings
Live trace viewer — sub-04 · task-pblt

Showing one representative recording out of 16 subjects and 16 recordings in this dataset. Browse the full set on OpenNeuro; drop any other _ieeg.{set,edf,bdf,vhdr} file onto the viewer (or pass ?ieeg=<url>) to inspect it.

No scalp electrode layout is currently indexed for this dataset. Once the eegdash montage registry ingests it, the interactive viewer will appear here automatically.

NEMAR Processing Statistics#

The plots below are generated by NEMAR’s automated EEG pipeline. The histogram shows pipeline success for data cleaning and ICA decomposition, the percentage of data frames and EEG channels retained after artefact removal, line noise per channel (RMS, dB), and the age/gender distribution of participants.

HED event descriptors word cloud HED event descriptors word cloud — NM000375
§ 05Manifest · BIDS tree

Manifest#

File Explorer#

Browse the BIDS file structure of this dataset. Records are fetched on demand from the EEGDash catalog the first time you open the explorer.

Recordings—
Files—
Subjects—
Modalities—
Click to load file structure…
Full dataset metadata table

Dataset ID

NM000375

Title

Neural interactions in the human frontal cortex dissociate reward and punishment learning (Combrisson et al., 2024): preprocessed SEEG high-gamma power, 16 patients (derivative)

Author (year)

—

Canonical

—

Importable as

NM000375

Year

2021

Authors

Etienne Combrisson, Ruggero Basanisi, Sylvain Rheims, Philippe Kahane, Julien Bastin, Andrea Brovelli

License

CC0-1.0

Citation / DOI

10.82901/nemar.nm000375

Source links

OpenNeuro | NeMAR | Source URL

Copy-paste BibTeX
@dataset{nm000375,
  title = {Neural interactions in the human frontal cortex dissociate reward and punishment learning (Combrisson et al., 2024): preprocessed SEEG high-gamma power, 16 patients (derivative)},
  author = {Etienne Combrisson and Ruggero Basanisi and Sylvain Rheims and Philippe Kahane and Julien Bastin and Andrea Brovelli},
  doi = {10.82901/nemar.nm000375},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.82901/nemar.nm000375},
}
§ 06API · Programmatic access

API Reference#

Signature
eegdash.dataset
class
eegdash.dataset.NM000375(cache_dir, query=None, s3_bucket=None, **kwargs)
Bases: EEGDashDataset
Author (year)—
Canonical—
Importable asNM000375
Sourceeegdash/dataset/registry.py · [source ↗]
class eegdash.dataset.NM000375(cache_dir: str, query: dict | None = None, s3_bucket: str | None = None, **kwargs)[source]#

Neural interactions in the human frontal cortex dissociate reward and punishment learning (Combrisson et al., 2024): preprocessed SEEG high-gamma power, 16 patients (derivative)

Study:

nm000375 (NeMAR)

Author (year):

—

Canonical:

—

Also importable as: NM000375.

Modality: ieeg; Subject type: Unknown. Subjects: 16; recordings: 16; tasks: 1.

Parameters:
  • cache_dir (str | Path) – Directory where data are cached locally.

  • query (dict | None) – Additional MongoDB-style filters to AND with the dataset selection. Must not contain the key dataset.

  • s3_bucket (str | None) – Base S3 bucket used to locate the data.

  • **kwargs (dict) – Additional keyword arguments forwarded to EEGDashDataset.

data_dir#

Local dataset cache directory (cache_dir / dataset_id).

Type:

Path

query#

Merged query with the dataset filter applied.

Type:

dict

records#

Metadata records used to build the dataset, if pre-fetched.

Type:

list[dict] | None

Notes

Each item is a recording; recording-level metadata are available via dataset.description. query supports MongoDB-style filters on fields in ALLOWED_QUERY_FIELDS and is combined with the dataset filter. Dataset-specific caveats are not provided in the summary metadata.

References

OpenNeuro dataset: https://openneuro.org/datasets/nm000375 NeMAR dataset: https://nemar.org/dataexplorer/detail?dataset_id=nm000375 DOI: https://doi.org/10.82901/nemar.nm000375

Examples

>>> from eegdash.dataset import NM000375
>>> dataset = NM000375(cache_dir="./data")
>>> recording = dataset[0]
>>> raw = recording.load()
__init__(cache_dir: str, query: dict | None = None, s3_bucket: str | None = None, **kwargs)[source]#
save(path: str, overwrite: bool = False, offset: int = 0)[source]#

Save datasets to files by creating one subdirectory for each dataset:

path/
    0/
        0-raw.fif | 0-epo.fif
        description.json
        raw_preproc_kwargs.json (if raws were preprocessed)
        window_kwargs.json (if this is a windowed dataset)
        window_preproc_kwargs.json  (if windows were preprocessed)
        target_name.json (if target_name is not None and dataset is raw)
    1/
        1-raw.fif | 1-epo.fif
        description.json
        raw_preproc_kwargs.json (if raws were preprocessed)
        window_kwargs.json (if this is a windowed dataset)
        window_preproc_kwargs.json  (if windows were preprocessed)
        target_name.json (if target_name is not None and dataset is raw)
Parameters:
  • path (str) –

    Directory in which subdirectories are created to store

    -raw.fif | -epo.fif and .json files to.

  • overwrite (bool) – Whether to delete old subdirectories that will be saved to in this call.

  • offset (int) – If provided, the integer is added to the id of the dataset in the concat. This is useful in the setting of very large datasets, where one dataset has to be processed and saved at a time to account for its original position.

Access modesMNE → braindecode → PyTorch → ML
.rawMNE Raw object — standard tools (filter, epoch, ICA, plot_psd).mne
DataLoaderWraps the windowed dataset into a PyTorch DataLoader; supports parallel workers and on-the-fly augmentations.pytorch
Zarr cacheOptional braindecode Zarr mirror for fast resume; persisted to cache_dir.zarr
Hugging FaceNo per-dataset mirror published yet — browse the EEGDash org listing for sibling datasets. See the datasets loader API.huggingface
Croissant 1.0Machine-readable JSON-LD descriptor — NM000375.croissant.json (MLCommons schema, ingestible by PyTorch / TensorFlow / JAX).mlcommons
Examples using EEGDashcurated · start here

Swap any load_dataset(...) call for nm000375 to reproduce the tutorial on this dataset.

Citation

Etienne Combrisson, Ruggero Basanisi, Sylvain Rheims, Philippe Kahane, Julien Bastin, … (2021). Neural interactions in the human frontal cortex dissociate reward and punishment learning (Combrisson et al., 2024): preprocessed SEEG high-gamma power, 16 patients (derivative). 10.82901/nemar.nm000375

Provenance

¹Contributed to nemar in BIDS format.

²Curated & ingested by the EEGDash catalog; see CITATION.cff for canonical reference.

³Persistent identifier: 10.82901/nemar.nm000375.

BIDS
BIDS 1.10.0
Sidecars
events · channels · eeg.json
Provenance
Machine-readable
Mirrors

See Also#