DS003922: meg dataset, 14 subjects#
Multisensory Correlation Detector
Citation: Pesnot Lerousseau, J., Parise, C., Ernst, MO., van Wassenhove, V. (2022). Multisensory Correlation Detector. 10.18112/openneuro.ds003922.v1.0.1
14-participant MEG dataset — Multisensory Correlation Detector.
Quickstart#
Install
pip install eegdash
Access the data
from eegdash.dataset import DS003922
dataset = DS003922(cache_dir="./data")
# Get the raw object of the first recording
raw = dataset.datasets[0].raw
print(raw.info)
Filter by subject
dataset = DS003922(cache_dir="./data", subject="01")
Advanced query
dataset = DS003922(
cache_dir="./data",
query={"subject": {"$in": ["01", "02"]}},
)
Iterate recordings
for rec in dataset:
print(rec.subject, rec.raw.info['sfreq'])
If you use this dataset in your research, please cite the original authors.
BibTeX
@dataset{ds003922,
title = {Multisensory Correlation Detector},
author = {Pesnot Lerousseau, J. and Parise, C. and Ernst, MO. and van Wassenhove, V.},
doi = {10.18112/openneuro.ds003922.v1.0.1},
url = {https://doi.org/10.18112/openneuro.ds003922.v1.0.1},
}
About This Dataset#
Magnetoencephalography (MEG) dataset recorded during the presentation of audiovisual sequences with a causality judgment task and temporal order judgment task. This MEG dataset was prepared in the Brain Imaging Data Structure (MEG-BIDS, Niso et al. 2018) format using MNE-BIDS (Appelhoff et al. 2019).
Pesnot Lerousseau, J., Parise, C., Ernst, MO., van Wassenhove, V. (2022). Multisensory correlation computations in the human brain identified by a time-resolved encoding model. *Nature Communications*. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29687-6
DESCRIPTION
PARTICIPANTS
The dataset contains 13 participants (Ab140232, Jl150443, Mm150194, Al150424, Mp110340, Rt160359, Cb140229, Cc160310, Lb160367, Mb160304, Mk150295, Sl160372, Mp150285).
EXPERIMENT
The experiment consisted of 10 consecutive recording blocks of 8 minutes each, whose order was counterbalanced across participants. Three blocks tested participants on a Causality judgement, and three blocks tested participants with a Temporal order judgement. Importantly, the same audiovisual sequences were used in both tasks in order to maintain a constant flow of feedforward multisensory inputs while manipulating the endogenous task requirements. Each block was composed of 25 repetitions of the 6 possible audiovisual sequences. A total of 75 presentations of each stimulus sequence were thus tested in each task. Four additional recording blocks consisted of participants passively hearing (auditory localizer, 2 blocks) or viewing (visual localizer, 2 blocks) one constitutive modality of the audiovisual sequence. Each localizer block was composed of 25 repetitions of the 6 possible stimuli (auditory or visual part of each stimuli), yielding a total of 50 presentations of each auditory and visual stimuli (2 tasks x 3 blocks x 25 repetitions x 6 sequences + 2 modalities x 25 repetitions x 2 blocks x 6 sequences = 1500 trials in total).
View full README
DESCRIPTION
PARTICIPANTS
The dataset contains 13 participants (Ab140232, Jl150443, Mm150194, Al150424, Mp110340, Rt160359, Cb140229, Cc160310, Lb160367, Mb160304, Mk150295, Sl160372, Mp150285).
EXPERIMENT
The experiment consisted of 10 consecutive recording blocks of 8 minutes each, whose order was counterbalanced across participants. Three blocks tested participants on a Causality judgement, and three blocks tested participants with a Temporal order judgement. Importantly, the same audiovisual sequences were used in both tasks in order to maintain a constant flow of feedforward multisensory inputs while manipulating the endogenous task requirements. Each block was composed of 25 repetitions of the 6 possible audiovisual sequences. A total of 75 presentations of each stimulus sequence were thus tested in each task. Four additional recording blocks consisted of participants passively hearing (auditory localizer, 2 blocks) or viewing (visual localizer, 2 blocks) one constitutive modality of the audiovisual sequence. Each localizer block was composed of 25 repetitions of the 6 possible stimuli (auditory or visual part of each stimuli), yielding a total of 50 presentations of each auditory and visual stimuli (2 tasks x 3 blocks x 25 repetitions x 6 sequences + 2 modalities x 25 repetitions x 2 blocks x 6 sequences = 1500 trials in total).
STIMULI
Six audiovisual sequences were presented (DD, DC, CC, AA, AV, VV).
BLOCKS
Ten blocks were presented (3 Causality, 3 Temporal, 2 Auditory, 2 Visual).
EVENTS
‘Causality/DD’:11
‘Causality/DC’:12
‘Causality/CC’:13
‘Causality/AA’:14
‘Causality/AV’:15
‘Causality/VV’:16
‘Temporal/DD’:21
‘Temporal/DC’:22
‘Temporal/CC’:23
‘Temporal/AA’:24
‘Temporal/AV’:25
‘Temporal/VV’:26
‘Auditory/DD’:41
‘Auditory/DC’:42
‘Auditory/CC’:43
‘Auditory/AA’:44
‘Auditory/AV’:45
‘Auditory/VV’:46
‘Visual/DD’:51
‘Visual/DC’:52
‘Visual/CC’:53
‘Visual/AA’:54
‘Visual/AV’:55
‘Visual/VV’:56
MEG
Brain magnetic fields were recorded in a MSR using a 306 MEG system (Neuromag Elekta LTD, Helsinki). MEG recordings were sampled at 1 kHz and band-pass filtered between 0.03 Hz and 330 Hz.
Four head position coils (HPI) measured the head position of participants before each block; three fiducial markers (nasion and pre-auricular points) were used for digitization and anatomicalMRI (aMRI) immediately following MEG acquisition. Electrooculograms (EOG, horizontal and vertical eye movements) and electrocardiogram (ECG) were simultaneously recorded. Prior to the session, 2 min of empty room recordings was acquired for the computation of the noise covariance matrix.
Bad MEG channels were marked manually.
MRI
The T1 weighted aMRI was recorded using a 3-T Siemens Trio MRI scanner. Parameters of the sequence were: voxel size: 1.0 × 1.0 × 1.1 mm; acquisition time: 466 s; repetition time TR = 2300 ms; and echo time TE = 2.98 ms
BEHAVIOR
File sourcedata/behavioral_data.txt
REFERENCES
Pesnot Lerousseau, J., Parise, C., Ernst, MO., van Wassenhove, V. (2022). Multisensory correlation computations in the human brain identified by a time-resolved encoding model. Nature Communications. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29687-6 Appelhoff, S., Sanderson, M., Brooks, T., Vliet, M., Quentin, R., Holdgraf, C., Chaumon, M., Mikulan, E., Tavabi, K., Höchenberger, R., Welke, D., Brunner, C., Rockhill, A., Larson, E., Gramfort, A. and Jas, M. (2019). MNE-BIDS: Organizing electrophysiological data into the BIDS format and facilitating their analysis. Journal of Open Source Software 4: (1896). https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01896 Niso, G., Gorgolewski, K. J., Bock, E., Brooks, T. L., Flandin, G., Gramfort, A., Henson, R. N., Jas, M., Litvak, V., Moreau, J., Oostenveld, R., Schoffelen, J., Tadel, F., Wexler, J., Baillet, S. (2018). MEG-BIDS, the brain imaging data structure extended to magnetoencephalography. Scientific Data, 5, 180110. http://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.110
Cohort#
Dataset Statistics#
Age distribution by gender (n=14, range 21–88 yr, mean 29.4 yr)
Sex composition
Channel counts (ch)
Sampling frequencies: 1000.0 Hz (n=151 recordings)
Total recording duration: 16 h 29 min
Signal · Electrodes & live trace#
Live trace viewer — sub-emptyroom · ses-20161129 · task-noise
Showing one representative recording out of
14 subjects and 164 recordings in this dataset.
Browse the full set on OpenNeuro;
drop any other _meg.{set,edf,bdf,vhdr} file onto the
viewer (or pass ?meg=<url>) to inspect it.
Electrode layout — MEG · 306 sensors — 306 channels
NEMAR Processing Statistics#
The plots below are generated by NEMAR’s automated EEG pipeline. The histogram shows pipeline success for data cleaning and ICA decomposition, the percentage of data frames and EEG channels retained after artefact removal, line noise per channel (RMS, dB), and the age/gender distribution of participants.
HED event descriptors word cloud
Manifest#
File Explorer#
Browse the BIDS file structure of this dataset. Records are fetched on demand from the EEGDash catalog the first time you open the explorer.
Full dataset metadata table
Dataset ID |
|
Title |
Multisensory Correlation Detector |
Author (year) |
|
Canonical |
— |
Importable as |
|
Year |
2022 |
Authors |
Pesnot Lerousseau, J., Parise, C., Ernst, MO., van Wassenhove, V. |
License |
CC0 |
Citation / DOI |
|
Source links |
OpenNeuro | NeMAR | Source URL |
Copy-paste BibTeX
@dataset{ds003922,
title = {Multisensory Correlation Detector},
author = {Pesnot Lerousseau, J. and Parise, C. and Ernst, MO. and van Wassenhove, V.},
doi = {10.18112/openneuro.ds003922.v1.0.1},
url = {https://doi.org/10.18112/openneuro.ds003922.v1.0.1},
}
API Reference#
eegdash.datasetEEGDashDatasetDS003922 · Lerousseau2021eegdash/dataset/registry.py · [source ↗]- class eegdash.dataset.DS003922(cache_dir: str, query: dict | None = None, s3_bucket: str | None = None, **kwargs)[source]#
Multisensory Correlation Detector
- Study:
ds003922(OpenNeuro)- Author (year):
Lerousseau2021- Canonical:
—
Also importable as:
DS003922,Lerousseau2021.Modality:
meg; Experiment type:Perception; Subject type:Healthy. Subjects: 14; recordings: 164; tasks: 3.- Parameters:
cache_dir (str | Path) – Directory where data are cached locally.
query (dict | None) – Additional MongoDB-style filters to AND with the dataset selection. Must not contain the key
dataset.s3_bucket (str | None) – Base S3 bucket used to locate the data.
**kwargs (dict) – Additional keyword arguments forwarded to
EEGDashDataset.
- data_dir#
Local dataset cache directory (
cache_dir / dataset_id).- Type:
Path
Notes
Each item is a recording; recording-level metadata are available via
dataset.description.querysupports MongoDB-style filters on fields inALLOWED_QUERY_FIELDSand is combined with the dataset filter. Dataset-specific caveats are not provided in the summary metadata.References
OpenNeuro dataset: https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds003922 NeMAR dataset: https://nemar.org/dataexplorer/detail?dataset_id=ds003922 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18112/openneuro.ds003922.v1.0.1 NEMAR citation count: 1
Examples
>>> from eegdash.dataset import DS003922 >>> dataset = DS003922(cache_dir="./data") >>> recording = dataset[0] >>> raw = recording.load()
- __init__(cache_dir: str, query: dict | None = None, s3_bucket: str | None = None, **kwargs)[source]#
- save(path: str, overwrite: bool = False, offset: int = 0)[source]#
Save datasets to files by creating one subdirectory for each dataset:
path/ 0/ 0-raw.fif | 0-epo.fif description.json raw_preproc_kwargs.json (if raws were preprocessed) window_kwargs.json (if this is a windowed dataset) window_preproc_kwargs.json (if windows were preprocessed) target_name.json (if target_name is not None and dataset is raw) 1/ 1-raw.fif | 1-epo.fif description.json raw_preproc_kwargs.json (if raws were preprocessed) window_kwargs.json (if this is a windowed dataset) window_preproc_kwargs.json (if windows were preprocessed) target_name.json (if target_name is not None and dataset is raw)
- Parameters:
path (str) –
- Directory in which subdirectories are created to store
-raw.fif | -epo.fif and .json files to.
overwrite (bool) – Whether to delete old subdirectories that will be saved to in this call.
offset (int) – If provided, the integer is added to the id of the dataset in the concat. This is useful in the setting of very large datasets, where one dataset has to be processed and saved at a time to account for its original position.
BaseDataset from braindecode — windowed via create_windows_from_events.braindecodeDataLoader; supports parallel workers and on-the-fly augmentations.pytorchdatasets.load_dataset("EEGDash/ds003922").huggingfaceSwap any load_dataset(...) call for ds003922 to reproduce the tutorial on this dataset.
Citation
Pesnot Lerousseau, J., Parise, C., Ernst, MO., van Wassenhove, V. (2022). Multisensory Correlation Detector. 10.18112/openneuro.ds003922.v1.0.1
Provenance
¹Contributed to openneuro in BIDS format.
²Curated & ingested by the EEGDash catalog; see CITATION.cff for canonical reference.
³Persistent identifier: 10.18112/openneuro.ds003922.v1.0.1.
See Also#
eegdash.dataset.EEGDashDataseteegdash.dataset